
For people like us, probably the most important question we had to ask a potential partner/lover/one-night-stand is: "Top or bottom?" Funny isn't it, how two adjectives could spell the difference between getting laid and not getting any.
In online dating for PLUs, role preference is almost always a "required field" when creating a profile. Of course, one may opt not to answer this question, particularly those who prefer to keep the cloak of mystery intact (not to mention, to widen the field). But for some, flirting with someone is a total waste of time if their role preference later turns out to be out of sync. Better to keep that out of the way early on. Role preference becomes a search filter in the engine.
It is interesting how we attach these labels to the person and extend it to our perception of him inside and outside the bedroom. For example, tops are viewed to be the dominant partner and hence, the one wearing the pants in the relationship. Same is true for bottoms, considered to be the "weaker" partner and the one wearing the skirt. But do our roles in the bedroom spill out of the door and stain other aspects of our lives as well?
I do not think so. It's one of the pecularities of our lives, that our bedroom roles are just that, roles we play in the bedroom. Just as a wife could be the master of a house, the bottom could be the dominant partner beyond the bedroom door. After all, anybody could be a top, anybody could be a bottom. Surgeons are not strictly top, are they? Theater actors are not always bottom. Policemen (come on), too. The thing is, outside the bedroom roles get reversed, and it is okay.


